vot xoroshee review ob'yasnyajushee nauchno kaka rbotaet distancionno energiya:
www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/107555304322848968
Nonclassical energy fields mediate resonant information
transfer between two quantum domains, whether they exist
within the body or between bodies (individuals). By considering
the interactions between two quantum systems contained
within a CAM healing arts practitioner and a client,
many anomalies within the field of energy medicine can be
explained. A fundamental property of interacting quantum
systems is that information transfer is independent of time
(instantaneous) and distance (nonlocal) (Julsgaard et al.,
2001). Therefore, quantum information transfer (Bennett
and DiVicenzo, 2000) can readily explain the ability of healers
and prayer to influence biological systems at a distance.
Because classical EM fields fade rapidly with distance from
the source, they cannot explain these anomalous CAM
modalities.
In addition to explaining the transfer of healing energy
between two people, the current model can also be used to
define mechanisms involved with the natural self-healing
process within people. The current perspective provides a
mechanism for a previously proposed energetic model of
self-healing (Rein, 1998). Simply stated the biofield is described
in terms of three fundamental energetic levels (infolded
within each other according to Bohm [1980]) that can
be listed in order of increasing density: quantum fields .
potential fields . classical EM fields. Healing information
originates in quantum domains at the most fundamental inner
spiritual level and cascades outward into the denser EM
layer, eventually reaching the physical body. Thus healing
information “imprints” all layers of the biofield. Under healing
conditions there is a resonance information transfer between
the different layers of the biofield, whereas in disease
information flow is impeded. Healing bioinformation resonates
with and neutralizes disease information. In this
model, the interface between the underlying quantum level
and the physical body is the potential and the classical EM
field. In other models, the interface is the meridian and nadi
systems. Thus each meridian/nadi can be seen as an energetic
infrastructure composed of similar quantum domains
and networks with a coordinated activity reflecting its physiologic
function. Smith’s experimental data indeed support
such a contention.
Still other models utilize consciousness or some aspect
of it as the interface between the quantum level and the body.
For example, thoughts and intentions could comprise a
unique mixture of quantum domains and networks. The information
content of each quantum domain would correspond
to the content of the thought or intention. The energetic
nature of various aspects of consciousness has been
considered by other investigators (Jahn and Dunne, 1986).
Conscious intentionality is now an area of scientific investigation
of relevance here when considering the intention of
practitioners. A variety of sensors have been used to mea-
BIOINFORMATION IN THE BIOFIELD 65
sure macroscopic effects of conscious intentions. These include
electronic sensors (Jahn and Dunne, 1986; Tiller,
1972), clinical measures (Benor, 1990; Schlitz et al., 2003;
Schwartz, 2001), cellular systems (Chien et al., 1991; Hintz
et al., 2003; Rein, 1992), biomolecules (Hameroff et al.,
2002; Rein, 1995) and water molecules (Dibble and Tiller,
1999; Schwartz and DeMattei, 1991). In some cases a correlation
was observed between the direction of the biologic
response and opposite intentions. Intentionality is also being
studied by traditional neuroscientists and in the emerging
field of consciousness research. From a neurologic perspective,
specific intentions are associated with patterns of
nerve firing within specific brain regions. Consciousness researchers
are now acknowledging a role for the local EM
fields, global nonclassical fields and quantum fields associated
with such nerve firing (Beck and Eccles, 1992;
Hameroff et al., 2002; Lounasmaa et al., 1996; Rein, 1993).
CONCLUSIONS
Theoretical and experimental evidence has been presented
for the existence of electric, magnetic, optical, and acoustic
classical and nonclassical energy fields emitted from and
contained within the body. Some nonclassical fields are most
accurately described by the equations of quantum physics.
These individual fields comprise a global collective biofield.
The anomalous behavior of biologic systems is consistent
with the presence of nonclassical fields in the body and in
the biofield. The incorporation of quantum physics and nonclassical
energy fields into our description of the human
biofield can enhance our understanding of many fundamental
principles in energy medicine.
Within this framework a quantum biologic model is proposed
as a possible mechanism for the natural self-healing
processes in the body. Furthermore, this model gives insight
into the contribution of energy medicine to facilitate this natural
healing process by supplying bioinformation at the
quantum and potential levels to neutralize disease information
within the body and the biofield contained within. Although
bioelectromagnetics can achieve this goal by supplying
frequency information at the EM level, energy
medicine can supply more subtle bioinformation stored at
deeper psychologic, emotional, and spiritual levels within
the biofield. Such insights should be helpful in designing
the next generation of energetic treatment modalities with
relevant bioinformation.